Inner privacy of conscious experiences and quantum information
arXiv Preprint Archive November 26, 2019 via arXiv
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractConsciousness consists of inner, subjective, private experiences that cannot be measured by physical devices or communicated as classical bits. Classical physics cannot explain how such unobservable, incommunicable experiences could arise from physical neurons. Thought experiments like inverted qualia and the knowledge argument illustrate this challenge but do not prove consciousness is nonphysical or that introspective reports are unreliable. Modern quantum physics offers a resolution: unobservable quantum state vectors define what physically exists, while quantum operators define what can be observed. Identifying consciousness with unobservable quantum information in brain states allows quantum information theorems to resolve paradoxes of privacy and explains how the observable brain is constructed from classical bits extracted upon measurement, bound by Holevo's theorem.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Physics.hist-ph Physics.bio-ph Quant-ph Consciousness Quantum physics |
| Key finding | Identifying consciousness with unobservable quantum information in brain states resolves paradoxes of privacy and explains how observable brain states arise from classical bits extracted via measurement, bound by Holevo's theorem. |
Abstract
The human mind is constituted by inner, subjective, private, first-person conscious experiences that cannot be measured with physical devices or observed from an external, objective, public, third-person perspective. The qualitative, phenomenal nature of conscious experiences also cannot be communicated to others in the form of a message composed of classical bits of information. Because in a classical world everything physical is observable and communicable, it is a daunting task to explain how an empirically unobservable, incommunicable consciousness could have any physical substrates such as neurons composed of biochemical molecules, water, and electrolytes. The challenges encountered by classical physics are exemplified by a number of thought experiments including the inverted qualia argument, the private language argument, the beetle in the box argument and the knowledge argument. These thought experiments, however, do not imply that our consciousness is nonphysical and our introspective conscious testimonies are untrustworthy. The principles of classical physics have been superseded by modern quantum physics, which contains two fundamentally different kinds of physical objects: unobservable quantum state vectors, which define what physically exists, and quantum operators (observables), which define what can physically be observed. Identifying consciousness with the unobservable quantum information contained by quantum physical brain states allows for application of quantum information theorems to resolve possible paradoxes created by the inner privacy of conscious experiences, and explains how the observable brain is constructed by accessible bits of classical information that are bound by Holevo's theorem and extracted from the physically existing quantum brain upon measurement with physical devices.