Skip to content

Towards a process-based approach to consciousness and collapse in quantum mechanics

Raoni Arroyo, Lauro de Matos Nunes Filho, Frederik Moreira dos Santos

arXiv Preprint Archive February 6, 2024 via arXiv

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The paper argues that the interpretation of quantum mechanics which assigns a causal role to human consciousness in measurement (the "consciousness causes collapse" interpretation) is traditionally tied to substance dualism and therefore inherits the mind-body problem. The authors propose that adopting a process-based metaphysical approach, inspired by Alfred North Whitehead's solution to the mind-body problem, offers a more coherent understanding of consciousness and its role in quantum mechanics. This article serves as the launch of a research program in the metaphysics of science to develop that approach.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Physics.hist-ph Quantum consciousness Quantum mechanics quant-ph Mind-matter interaction Measurement problem
Key finding A process-based metaphysical approach, drawing on Whitehead's philosophy, may provide a better framework for the consciousness causes collapse interpretation of quantum mechanics than substance dualism.

Abstract

According to a particular interpretation of quantum mechanics, the causal role of human consciousness in the measuring process is called upon to solve a foundational problem called the "measurement problem". Traditionally, this interpretation is tied up with the metaphysics of substance dualism. As such, this interpretation of quantum mechanics inherits the dualist's mind-body problem. Our working hypothesis is that a process-based approach to the consciousness causes collapse interpretation (CCCI) -- leaning on Whitehead's solution to the mind-body problem -- offers a better metaphysical understanding of consciousness and its role in interpreting quantum mechanics. This article is the kickoff for such a research program in the metaphysics of science.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment