Use of psychedelic treatments in psychiatric clinical practice: an EPA policy paper

The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) acknowledges the therapeutic potential of psychedelic substances for mental disorders, such as psilocybin for depression, which are nearing regulatory approval in the US and Europe. This policy paper highlights both the benefits and challenges of psychedelic treatments, emphasizing the importance of psychosocial components and ethical, professional aspects for real-world implementation. Four recommendations are formulated to guide further research and clinical integration, aiming for safe, ethical, and equitable access for all patients who may benefit.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent years show an exponential increased interest (“renaissance”) in the use of psychedelics for the treatment of mental disorders and broader. Some of these treatments, such as psilocybin for depression, are in the process of formal regulation by regulatory bodies in the US (FDA) and Europe (EMA), and as such on the brink of real-world implementation. In the slipstream of these developments increasing commercial initiatives are taking shape. The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) acknowledges both the therapeutic potential of psychedelic substances and the challenges for both research and clinical implementation. Steps need to be taken toward a well-balanced policy based upon sound scientific evidence and research, aiming at safe, ethical responsible integration of psychedelic therapy available for all patients who can potentially benefit. Methods In this EPA policy paper, we highlight the potential benefits, and also the challenges of psychedelic treatments, which can be relevant for the future real-world implementation of these treatments. Results In addition to an overview of the current evidence and hypotheses of working mechanisms of psychedelic treatment, this policy paper specifically highlights the importance of the psychosocial components of the treatment as well as the ethical and professional aspects playing a role in real-world implementation. Conclusions Four recommendations are formulated for further research and clinical implementation.