Mystical experiences without mysticism: An argument for mystical fictionalism in psychedelics
Journal of Psychedelic Studies – June 08, 2022
Source: OpenAlex
Summary
Profound mystical experiences frequently precede significant reductions in suffering, a compelling finding in Psychology and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies. Yet, for empiricists, acknowledging "mystical experiences" presents an epistemological challenge, implying a genuine mystical reality. This philosophical argument hinders complex analysis in Psychedelics and Drug Studies, particularly concerning chemical synthesis and alkaloids. Philosophical fictionalism, drawing on logic and linguistics, allows analysis of these experiences as "true" without asserting their veridicality. This refines our understanding, improving psychedelic-assisted treatments and fostering scientific humility.
Abstract
Abstract Mystical experiences frequently precede decreases in human suffering or increased functioning. Therapies that include the ingestion of psychoactive substances in supportive environments often lead to improvements that correlate with the magnitude of the mystical experiences generated. A close look at these phenomena from a philosophy of science perspective might put empiricists in a quandary. Arguments with critics of the import of these mystical experiences, prohibitionists, or others who are apprehensive about psychedelic-assisted treatments, might prove awkward or difficult given the tacit assertion that the mystical genuinely exists. The assumption might even dampen theorizing in ways that remain outside of theorists' awareness. The predicament might lack the epistemic humility ideal for good science as well. Nevertheless, abandoning the construct of mystical experiences would require ignoring compelling, replicated empirical work. We argue that a version of philosophical fictionalism that draws on research in logic and linguistics can help investigators engage in this discourse without implying a belief in the mystical. Comparable approaches have proven helpful in mathematics and empiricism more broadly. Mystical fictionalism could help theorists view reports of mystical experiences as true even if the mystical fails to be veridical. The approach creates an expressive advantage that could assist researchers and theorists eager to refine our understanding of mystical experiences and improve psychedelic-assisted treatments. Mystical fictionalism might also inspire novel looks at correlates of mystical experiences that might serve as mediators of their effects, potentially generating models with comparable explanatory power that sidestep the need for a fictionalist approach.