Skip to content

Compensatory hallucinogenesis across three neuropsychiatric disorders: a Bayesian account.

Raina Vin, Jordan Galbraith, Rashina Seabury, Hae Young Yi, Gabriela Hernández-busot, Lucas Oland, Boris Epie, Anne Trainer, Carolyn Fredericks, Albert R Powers

Brain communications January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcag001 via PubMed

Summary

Hallucinations may arise from an over-reliance on prior knowledge during perception, potentially as a compensatory response to degraded sensory information. This perspective unifies visual hallucinations across Charles Bonnet syndrome, dementia with Lewy bodies, and psychosis within a Bayesian computational framework. In each disorder, sensory signal disruptions at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy produce hallucinations with distinct characteristics, reflecting the localization and overtness of the disruption. Discrete sensory disruptions in Charles Bonnet syndrome translate to hallucinations via known circuits, while different disruptions in dementia with Lewy bodies and schizophrenia lead to distinct phenomenology, comorbidities, and circuit involvement. This framework may help identify pathophysiologically distinct patient subgroups and guide new interventions.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Bayesian computational framework Charles bonnet syndrome Psychosis Sensory signal disruption
Key finding Visual hallucinations across Charles Bonnet syndrome, dementia with Lewy bodies, and psychosis can be understood within a common Bayesian computational framework as a compensatory response to sensory signal disruptions at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that hallucinations may arise because of an over-reliance on prior knowledge during perception. While best established in psychosis-spectrum illness, data also support the presence of this abnormality in other hallucination-prone neuropsychiatric illnesses that vary in their association with disruption of sensory circuits. In this piece, we ask whether an over-weighting of expectations may be conceived of as a compensatory response to degraded incoming sensory information. We make the case that visual hallucinogenesis across a wide array of neuropsychiatric disorders can be captured within a common Bayesian computational framework, as a compensatory response to sensory signal disruptions at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy. We focus on three specific disorders (Charles Bonnet syndrome, dementia with Lewy Bodies and psychosis) with prominent visual hallucinations and highlight the fact that these disorders describe a spectrum of visual impairment where the overtness and localization of the visual processing disruption is reflected in the characteristics of the emergent visual hallucinations. We examine how discrete sensory disruptions in Charles Bonnet syndrome translate to hallucinations via known circuits, and then how different disruptions in dementia with Lewy Bodies and Schizophrenia may lead to hallucinations with distinct phenomenology, comorbidities and circuit involvement. Finally, we appeal to emerging computational theories to unite these observations under a common conceptual umbrella. Taken together, this work presents a means of understanding how sensory disruptions could interact with other aspects of cognitive and neural architecture to produce hallucinations across neuropsychiatric disease. It is our hope that this framework will help in efforts to identify pathophysiologically distinct patient subgroups and new pharmacological and circuit-based interventions.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment