Review on the Comparative Effectiveness of Ketamine and Electroconvulsive Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression
Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry – September 29, 2025
Source: CrossRef
Summary
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) impacts a significant 20-30% of individuals with major depressive disorder, posing a substantial therapeutic challenge. Ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) offer promising interventions. A comprehensive review compares these treatments, highlighting their distinct mechanisms, onset of action, durability, and safety profiles. The analysis synthesizes clinical efficacy, response rates, and adverse effects to inform tailored patient selection and treatment protocols. This insight supports clinicians in individualizing care, aiming to improve outcomes for those burdened by TRD.
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affected nearly 20–30% of individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder and remained a significant therapeutic challenge. The lack of response to traditional antidepressant therapies placed a substantial emotional, functional, and economic burden on patients and healthcare systems. In recent years, ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) emerged as two of the most promising nontraditional interventions for individuals with TRD. Although both treatments demonstrated meaningful antidepressant effects, important differences were observed in their mechanisms, onset of action, durability of response, and safety profiles. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive comparative overview of ketamine and ECT in the management of TRD, summarizing evidence regarding their clinical efficacy, response and remission rates, and adverse effect profiles. The review also highlighted key clinical considerations, including patient selection criteria, treatment protocols, and practical issues that influenced therapeutic decision-making. By integrating findings from contemporary clinical studies and expert perspectives, this article offered clinicians an informative synthesis to support individualized treatment planning. Ultimately, the review underscored the importance of tailoring interventions to patient needs and contributed insights to improve outcomes for individuals affected by the burden of treatment-resistant depression.