Advances and Challenges in LSD Detection: Analytical Techniques, Matrix Selection, and Validation Gaps in Forensic Toxicology
Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry – November 04, 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Summary
Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) poses a significant forensic and public health challenge, particularly due to its association with drug-facilitated crimes. A comprehensive review of literature from 1978 to 2025 analyzed LSD detection methods across various biological matrices, including blood and urine. Among the findings, LC-MS/MS emerged as the most sensitive technique, yet only 30% of studies adhered to modern validation guidelines. Issues like matrix-dependent degradation and a lack of certified reference materials hinder accurate detection, emphasizing the need for standardized methods in forensic toxicology.
Abstract
Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) remains a significant forensic and public health concern due to its widespread abuse and association with drug-facilitated crimes. Detecting LSD and its analogs in biological specimens, particularly postmortem matrices, presents analytical challenges stemming from its low dosage, rapid metabolism, and structural similarities to novel lysergamides. This review critically examines trends in validated analytical methods for LSD detection in forensic toxicology. A systematic review of literature from 1978 to 2025 was conducted using databases, such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The analysis focused on reported methodologies for LSD and its metabolites across various matrices, including blood, urine, hair, oral fluid, and vitreous humor. Extraction techniques (LLE, SPE, DLLME) and analytical platforms (GC-MS/MS, LC-MS/MS, CE-MS) were compared, with emphasis on validation parameters, such as sensitivity, specificity, recovery, LOD, LOQ, matrix effects, and stability. The review identifies LC-MS/MS as the most sensitive and widely validated technique; however, discrepancies remain in matrix-specific validations and stability assessments. Challenges include the lack of certified reference materials for LSD analogs, matrix-dependent degradation, and limited methods for emerging sample types, such as dried blood spots (DBS). Few studies fully comply with modern forensic validation guidelines, limiting the reproducibility and admissibility of results in legal settings. This review highlights critical gaps in current forensic LSD detection protocols and underscores the need for standardized, validated methods applicable to diverse matrices. Future research should prioritize the development of rapid, eco-friendly, high-throughput methods capable of detecting LSD and its analogs at ultra-trace levels.