Intranasal Esketamine Versus Other Pharmacological Strategies in Treatment-Resistant Depression with High Suicide Risk: A Six-Month Naturalistic Study.
Ana María De Granda-beltrán, Alejandro Porras-segovia, Daniel Núñez-arias, Alba Rodríguez-jover, Maria Paula Jassir Acosta, Philippe Courtet, Enrique Baca-garcía, Inmaculada Peñuelas-calvo
Clinics and practice June 12, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.3390/clinpract16060110 via PubMed
Summary
Intranasal esketamine was associated with a faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) patients with high suicide risk compared to alternative pharmacological treatments. In a six-month study of 62 patients, those receiving esketamine showed significant improvements, with a number needed to treat of 1.35 to prevent one case of high suicide risk. Functional improvement was similar between the two groups.
Study at a glance
| Design | naturalistic prospective cohort study |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 62 |
| Population | patients with treatment-resistant depression and high suicide risk |
| Key finding | Esketamine-treated patients exhibited a faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms than those receiving alternative pharmacological strategies. |
Abstract
Background: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) poses a major clinical challenge, particularly when accompanied by suicidal behavior. Intranasal esketamine has demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in TRD, but real-world comparative evidence remains limited. Methods: We conducted a six-month naturalistic prospective cohort study in two Spanish mental health centers, including 62 TRD patients with high suicide risk undergoing fourth-line treatment. Thirty patients received intranasal esketamine and thirty-two alternative pharmacological interventions. Suicidal ideation (C-SSRS), depressive symptoms (HAM-D-17) and functional status (FAST) were assessed at baseline and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement during follow-up; however, esketamine-treated patients exhibited a faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms than those receiving alternative pharmacological strategies. The number needed to treat to prevent one case of high suicide risk was 1.35. Functional improvement was comparable between groups. Conclusions: In real-world clinical settings, intranasal esketamine was associated with a faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms among TRD patients with high suicide risk, supporting its role as a rapid-acting therapeutic option within comprehensive and closely monitored care.