Philosophy and Science on the Way to Knowing and Making Consciousness
RUDN Journal of Philosophy January 10, 2023 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-4-740-754 via DOAJ
Summary
Empirical studies of consciousness and advancements in AI have prompted a reevaluation of philosophical concepts related to consciousness. The current empirical theories are still in a pre-paradigmatic stage, meaning they don't yet pose a significant challenge to philosophy. The author discusses the ambiguous nature of 'consciousness' and emphasizes that philosophical frameworks must meet specific empirical criteria to remain relevant. Ultimately, successful theories should enable the creation and control of artificial conscious devices.
Study at a glance
| Key finding | Current empirical theories of consciousness are in a pre-paradigmatic stage and do not yet threaten philosophical understandings. |
|---|
Abstract
The latest progress in empirical studies of consciousness and spectacular advances in AI technologies kick philosophy out of the familiar comfort of uncontrolled proliferation of concepts and scholastic disputes. In the overview of the current state of empirical theories of consciousness, author reveals that those theories still find themselves in the pre-paradigmatic stage, therefore not yet posing an immediate existential threat to the philosophy of consciousness, though making it watch out. Author attempts to deal with the certain ambiguity of the term ‘consciousness’, stripping its meaning from parts already susceptible to science and technology and from parts still highly unlikely to be explained away. Besides, the relationship between philosophy and science is specified in general by analyzing them to their inner dynamics of theories and ontologies, showing that for science, the distinction between the two is substantially more important than for philosophy. From this perspective, philosophical schemas of consciousness claiming to be ‘experiential’ must have met recently formulated criteria for empirical theories of consciousness, otherwise failing to explain anything in the domain. Finally, author adds his pragmatic criterion that addresses the technological perspectives a theory provides. In the end, a winning competitive theory will have to let us produce and control artificial conscious devices.