Three propositions about conscious experience and their implications for theories of consciousness.

Summary

The paper presents three propositions regarding consciousness in the human brain. It argues that conscious information should be distinguished from the information itself, that while information can be conscious, processes acting on that information cannot be. Additionally, it states that access consciousness is merely access, with no operational difference when labeled as such. The author emphasizes the need for a generative mechanism to explain conscious experience, which has not yet been proposed.

Study at a glance

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to make and defend three simple propositions about what can and cannot be conscious in the human brain and to elucidate their implications for research and theory on consciousness. The first proposition is that the fact that some information is conscious should be, but often is not, distinguished from the information itself. The second proposition is that, treating the brain as an information processing system, information can be conscious (or not) but processes that operate on information cannot be conscious. This is illustrated with analysis of voluntary action generation, such as making a verbal report. The third proposition is that access consciousness is just access. Adding the word "consciousness" to it makes no difference to how it operates. An information processing system exactly like the human brain but in which no information was conscious would function in exactly the same way as human brains in which some information is conscious. Conscious experience must be explained by means of a generative mechanism; no such mechanism has yet been proposed.

Tags