Skip to content

A spectrum of self-processing modes: Indian philosophical insights and contemporary science on wellbeing

Sonu Sharma, Pradeep Kumar, Vishva Chaudhary, A C Senthil Kumar, Anupam Yadav, Ravinder Kumar, Annu Yadav, Anshul Girdhar, Nidhi Kalonia, Pavitra Singh

Frontiers in Psychology July 7, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1884131 via OpenAlex

Summary

Indian philosophical traditions like Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism critique the idea of a fixed self-identity, contrasting with contemporary psychology's focus on a cohesive self for wellbeing. This conceptual paper introduces a spectrum model of self-referential processing, meta-awareness, and non-self experience, suggesting that wellbeing may depend on flexible self-identification rather than mere enhancement. The discussion also addresses implications for research and clinical practice.

Study at a glance

Key finding Wellbeing may involve flexible regulation of self-identification rather than simple self-enhancement.

Abstract

While contemporary psychology focuses on developing a cohesive self for wellbeing, Indian philosophical traditions such as Advaita Vedanta, Buddhism and the teachings of J. Krishnamurti provide a critique of the notion of a fixed self-identity. This conceptual paper compares them at a phenomenological and functional level and relates these comparisons to contemplative neuroscience, particularly the default mode network, self-referential processing, and meditation-related changes in self-experience. Furthermore, It proposes a spectrum model: self-referential processing as an ordinary mode, meta-awareness as a trainable capacity, and non-self experience as a transformed outcome. The framework suggests that wellbeing may involve flexible regulation of self-identification rather than simple self-enhancement. Finally, implications for research, clinical practice, and cultural interpretation are discussed.

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment