Skip to content

Philosophy and Neuroscience: Tango or Solo Dancing?

Steven Gouveia, Ângela Leite

Principia an international journal of epistemology March 25, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.5007/1808-1711.2026.e106055 via OpenAlex

Summary

The paper discusses four approaches to the relationship between philosophical investigation and neuroscientific research regarding the conscious mind. It contrasts an Isolationist Approach, which sees philosophy and neuroscience as separate, with three other approaches that advocate for some form of interaction: Reductionist, Neurophenomenological, and Non-Reductive Neurophilosophical Approaches. It concludes with experimental data indicating that experts in neurophilosophy prefer methods that interconnect both fields.

Study at a glance

Design qualitative study
Population experts in neurophilosophy
Key finding Experts in neurophilosophy show a preference for approaches that interconnect philosophical and neuroscientific disciplines.

Abstract

In this paper, I want to briefly introduce how four approaches that relate (or not) philosophical investigation with the neuroscientific research can be considered in order to achieve a methodology that can effectively investigate the phenomenon of the conscious mind and its relationship with the brain. The traditional way of defining philosophical work seems to be clearly opposed to the traditional way of conceiving neuroscientific work. That raises the question that serves as the title of the paper: should we conceive the relationship between philosophy and neuroscience as a kind of “solo dancing”, that is, isolated without any kind of interaction? Or should we conceive that relationship as a “tango”, that is, an actively continuous relationship that complements each other? The Isolationist Approach argues for a “solo dancing” relationship, denying any kind of interaction. Next, rejecting this “solo dancing” approach, the Reductionist Approach (RA) will focus on specifying how philosophical work can be reduced to neuroscientific work. Arguing against the reductive aspect of (RA), but maintain a “tango” relationship, the Neurophenomenological Approach (NA) will demonstrate the importance of an embodied approach to the study of the conscious mind. Finally, the Non-Reductive Neurophilosophical Approach (NRNA) will expose a particular methodology that conceives the epistemic utility of both philosophical and neuroscientific work to investigate the conscious brain. After this brief reflection, we will provide some experimental philosophy data collected on how experts in neurophilosophy (broadly considered) judge this relationship, showing that there is a preference for approaches that interconnect both disciplines (even if the specific kind of interconnections is not particular).

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment