How Does Private Language Bear on the Cartesian Theory of Mind?
Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies January 18, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.17265/2328-2177/2026.01.008 via OpenAlex
Summary
This article examines how Wittgenstein's private language argument challenges Cartesian dualism, the view that mind and body are separate. It argues that mind and body are not distinct and independent; rather, the mind should be understood as the root of the body.
Study at a glance
| Key finding | The mind and body are not distinct and independent; the mind should be elucidated as the root of the body. |
|---|
Abstract
The Cartesian meditations on first philosophy intended to demonstrate the existence of God. Wittgenstein’s private language argument is regarded as an attack on Cartesian dualism through the investigation of “private language” by a paradigm of sensation. This article explores how the “private language argument” bears on the Cartesian theory of mind. The mind and the body are not distinct and independent. Instead, the mind should be elucidated as the root of the body.