Skip to content

How Does Private Language Bear on the Cartesian Theory of Mind?

Yi Zhang

Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies January 18, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.17265/2328-2177/2026.01.008 via OpenAlex

Summary

This article examines how Wittgenstein's private language argument challenges Cartesian dualism, the view that mind and body are separate. It argues that mind and body are not distinct and independent; rather, the mind should be understood as the root of the body.

Study at a glance

Key finding The mind and body are not distinct and independent; the mind should be elucidated as the root of the body.

Abstract

The Cartesian meditations on first philosophy intended to demonstrate the existence of God. Wittgenstein’s private language argument is regarded as an attack on Cartesian dualism through the investigation of “private language” by a paradigm of sensation. This article explores how the “private language argument” bears on the Cartesian theory of mind. The mind and the body are not distinct and independent. Instead, the mind should be elucidated as the root of the body.

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment