Skip to content

The Model of Consciousness: An Analysis of Causation, Self, Gödel’s Incompleteness, and Buddhist Philosophy

Mahendra Samarawickrama

Journal of Physics, Conference Series June 1, 2025 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/3027/1/012014 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

Gödel's incompleteness theorems show that logical and computational systems are inherently incomplete and undecidable. This paper argues that consciousness, understood as a non-material, chaotic finite-state machine without self-referencing, can achieve a complete and decidable understanding of reality. Drawing on Theravāda Buddhist philosophy, the authors propose that awareness of causation, free from self-referencing, aligns with the causal and deterministic nature of reality, thereby transcending the limitations of formal systems. This model suggests that present-moment awareness preserves the integrity of conscious experience and offers a pathway to deeper insight into existence.

Study at a glance

Design theoretical or philosophical paper
Key finding Consciousness, operating as a non-material and chaotic finite-state machine without self-referencing, can achieve a complete and decidable understanding of reality, transcending the limitations of Gödel's incompleteness theorems.

Abstract

This paper examines the limitations of analytical and computational methods in understanding reality, highlighting the secondary role of language and mathematics, which often leads to paradoxes. Gödel’s incompleteness theorems underscore the inherent incompleteness and undecidability in logical and computational systems, such as the Turing machine. We propose that consciousness, operating as a non-material and chaotic finite-state machine (FSM) devoid of self-referencing, can achieve a complete and decidable understanding of reality. This contrasts with the self-referencing nature of logical systems that leads to paradoxes and limitations. Through a conceptual model of the mind inspired by Theravāda Buddhist philosophy, we suggest that awareness of causation is free from self-referencing and coherent with the unpredictable yet causal and deterministic nature of reality. This alignment offers a pathway to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of causation. The model illustrates the tight integrity between consciousness and causation, proposing that awareness of the present moment of causation can transcend the limitations of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. This awareness, free from analytical and computational constraints, preserves the integrity of conscious experience and provides a complete and decidable understanding of reality. Future research will focus on developing techniques to sustain this awareness, potentially leading to wisdom and deep insight into the fundamental nature of existence.

Tags

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment