The ALARM Theory of Consciousness: A Two-Level Theory of Phenomenal Consciousness
Journal of Consciousness Studies March 31, 2023 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.53765/20512201.30.3.084 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
A novel theoretical framework, the ALARM theory, proposes that consciousness has two distinct levels: basic arousal, which acts as an alarm system for survival under intense threats, and general alertness, which supports flexible learning and behavior. This two-level account explains recent findings on subcortical brain activity, particularly thalamic processes, and differences in non-human animal behavior suggesting two types of conscious experience. The framework unifies neural evidence for subcortical and cortico-cortical loops and clarifies the evolutionary and functional roles of consciousness.
Study at a glance
| Design | theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key finding | The ALARM theory distinguishes basic arousal and general alertness as two levels of consciousness, accounting for subcortical brain activities, animal behavior differences, and unifying neural evidence for subcortical and cortico-cortical processes. |
Abstract
The scientific investigation of consciousness generates new findings at a rapid pace. We argue that we need a novel theoretical framework, which we call the ALARM theory of consciousness, in order to account for all central observations. According to this theory, we need to distinguish two levels of consciousness, namely basic arousal and general alertness. Basic arousal functions as a specific alarm system, keeping a biological organism alive under sudden intense threats, and general alertness enables flexible learning and behavioural strategies. This two-level theory of consciousness helps us to account for (i) recent discoveries of subcortical brain activities with a central role of thalamic processes, (ii) observations of differences in the behavioural repertoire of non-human animals indicating two types of conscious experiences. Furthermore, the framework enables us (iii) to unify the neural evidence for the relevance of subcortical processes, on the one hand, and of cortico-cortical loops, on the other, and finally (iv) to clarify the evolutionary and actual functional role of conscious experiences.