Beyond Local Domains: Connective Ontology in (Post-)Cognitive Sociology.

Summary

Cognitive science has long treated cognition as brain-bound information processing, but post-cognitivist approaches relocate it in active social and material environments. This paper argues that cognitive sociology, which still often assumes a cognitivist framework, could benefit from post-cognitivist ideas. Using connective ontology from the sociology of personal life, the author reconceptualizes cognition as dynamically emergent ecological energies, showing how post-cognitivism enables genuinely social ontologies of cognition.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Ontology in cognitive science has long been dominated by cognitivism, developing computer science metaphors to position cognition as intrinsic mind-brain information-processing. Contemporary cognitivism hypothesises localised domain-specificity, disaggregating cognition into discrete subtypes, each of which exists in a dedicated brain region. Latterly, peripheral cognitive science scholarships have contested these ideas, cultivating post-cognitivist dispositions with radical ontologies, relocating cognition in active socio-material ecologies. Nonetheless, much cognitive sociology retains cognitivist ontology, treating sociological phenomena as extrinsic constraints that influence the mind-brain's foundational cognition. I argue that cognitive sociology could fruitfully engage with post-cognitivist science. As an example, I use connective ontology, from the sociology of personal life, to conceptualise cognition as dynamically emergent and vitally animated ecological connective energies. Doing so, I show that post-cognitivism offers routes towards genuine social ontologies of cognition as a sociological matter, moving beyond cognitivism.

Tags