Art and linguistic bodies: a transformative view
Ståle Finke, Thomas Netland, Mattias Solli
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences April 1, 2026 Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1007/s11097-023-09948-5 via Springer Nature
Summary
Art transforms everyday experience by creating original communicative situations, rejecting both the idea that art is completely separate from life and the idea that it is merely a direct continuation of ordinary experience. Drawing on the enactive concept of humans as linguistic bodies and Hans-Georg Gadamer's hermeneutics, the article argues that art functions as a form of symbolic transformation. It engages with enactivist perspectives from Shaun Gallagher and Alva Noë, then proposes a pluralistic understanding of art media and a view of art experience as a mode of embodied, ideational thought.
Study at a glance
| Design | theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Art is a form of symbolic transformation that creates original communicative situations, distinct from both autonomist and direct continuity views of the relation between art and everyday experience. |
Abstract
This article takes its point of departure from the second (embodied) linguistic turn represented by the enactivist notion of humans as linguistic bodies, using resources from Hans Georg Gadamer in order to propose a view of the relation between art and everyday experience as one of symbolic transformation. Conceiving art as a form of linguistic phenomenon wherein one can engage in original situations of communication, this view rejects both autonomist and direct continuity views of the art-everyday relation. We start by situating the idea of linguistic bodies within the enactive approach, spelling out relevant aspects concerning the significance of language for human life and perception (Sect. 2). Then we embark on a discussion of aspects of Shaun Gallagher’s and Alva Noë’s enactivist perspectives on art experience, highlighting places where their views align with and depart from ours (Sect. 3). The last two sections aim to lay out the transformative view in more detail, proposing a pluralistic understanding of art media and a view of art and art experience as modes of ideational, embodied thought (Sects. 4 and 5).