The abuse liability of ketamine: A scoping review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Summary

Ketamine and its enantiomers show different abuse liability. Preclinical evidence indicates that (R,S)-ketamine and (S)-ketamine carry greater risk for abuse than (R)-ketamine, which at antidepressant-relevant doses in rodents appears safe with minimal liability. In clinical settings, limited studies suggest that single or repeated ketamine administrations under professional control did not lead to misuse, dependence, diversion, or gateway activity in patients with treatment-resistant depression. However, most clinical studies were retrospective and lacked systematic evaluation with validated scales. The review identified 65 eligible studies (55 preclinical, 10 clinical), with only 4 preclinical studies evaluating enantiomer abuse liability.

Study at a glance

Abstract

While ketamine has been used clinically over the past decades, it has only been recently shown to be a promising therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, ketamine and related dissociative agents may also be misused recreationally, creating significant concerns for abuse liability when prescribed for depression. Although the abuse potential of ketamine is widely recognized, there is limited evidence on the differential abuse liability of ketamine enantiomers, (S)-ketamine and (R)-ketamine. The current scoping review aims to summarize the extant literature on the abuse liability of (R,S)-ketamine and the enantiomers. A systematic search was conducted on the Embase, Medline, and APA PsycInfo databases from 1947 to July 29, 2021. Clinical and preclinical studies that assessed the abuse potential of (R,S)-ketamine, (S)-ketamine, and (R)-ketamine were screened and assessed for eligibility by two independent reviewers. A total of 65 eligible studies were identified; 55 were preclinical studies and 10 were clinical studies. Only 4 preclinical studies evaluated the abuse liability of ketamine enantiomers. Available preclinical evidence suggests that (R,S)-ketamine and (S)-ketamine have greater risk for abuse compared to (R)-ketamine. (R)-ketamine, at the antidepressant-relevant doses in rodents, appears to be safe with minimal liability for abuse. Although the abuse potential of (R,S)-ketamine is well-established in animals, limited clinical studies indicate that single or repeated ketamine administrations in professionally controlled settings did not result in misuse, dependence, diversion and/or gateway activity in patients with TRD. However, most clinical studies were retrospective and did not systematically evaluate the abuse liability of ketamine via validated psychological scales/questionnaires. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted to ascertain the abuse liability of racemic, (S)- and (R)-ketamine in TRD population, especially among patients with comorbid substance use disorders.