The Relationship Between Acute Dissociative Effects Induced by Ketamine and Treatment Response in Adolescent Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression

Summary

Ketamine is an effective rapid-acting antidepressant, but its acute dissociative effects do not predict depression response in adolescents with treatment-resistant depression. In a secondary analysis of 16 adolescents from a crossover trial, no significant associations were found between dissociative symptoms—measured by the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale—and depression improvement or response one day after ketamine infusion. When receiving the control drug midazolam, higher depersonalization symptoms were linked to less improvement. These findings contrast with some adult studies and may be limited by the small sample size, which reduces the ability to detect small or medium effects.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Objective: Ketamine has proven effective as a rapid-acting antidepressant agent. Several adult studies have investigated the association between ketamine's acute dissociative effects and depression response, but no studies have examined the association in adolescents with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of 16 adolescent participants who participated in a randomized, single-dose, midazolam-controlled crossover trial of ketamine in adolescents with depression. We examined the association between the acute dissociative symptoms (measured at 60 minutes following start of infusion using the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale [CADSS], and its three subscales: depersonalization, derealization, amnesia) and response and depression symptom improvement at 1'day (using the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale). Results: Within the ketamine group, there were no significant associations between dissociation symptoms or CADSS subscale scores and magnitude of depression symptom improvement or likelihood of ketamine response. When receiving midazolam, there was no significant association between overall dissociation symptoms and magnitude or likelihood of response of depressive symptoms. Higher levels of symptoms on the ‘depersonalization’ CADSS subscale when receiving midazolam were associated with less improvement in depression symptoms at 1 day following infusion. Conclusions: In contrast to some adult literature, the current data do not show a relationship between acute dissociative effects and antidepressant response to ketamine in pediatric patients with TRD. Interpretation may be limited by the small sample size, reducing the power to detect small or medium associations. Future research should utilize larger samples to more definitively measure the magnitude of association between acute dissociative symptoms and later antidepressant response to ketamine and to assess the relationship to trial design (e.g., crossover vs. parallel trial, comparison condition utilized and number of infusions) within both adult and pediatric populations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02579928.