Habits of affluence: unfeeling, enactivism and the ecological crisis of capitalism
Mind & Society August 14, 2024 DOI: 10.1007/s11299-024-00309-6 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
Habits common in affluent societies both sustain and conceal an unsustainable status quo. Enactivism, a philosophical approach emphasizing embodied and embedded cognition, can help identify and critically examine these habits and the environments that foster them. This analysis is situated within a critical theory of the unfelt, which describes how social collectives systematically produce gaps in emotional concern. The lack of proportionate affective and practical responses to the ecological crisis exemplifies this. The article draws on the concept of the imperial mode of living to develop a fuller picture of habits of affluence, then discusses two dimensions of these habits to advance a politically engaged version of enactivism.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Philosophy Environmental science Sociology |
| Citations | 12 |
| Key finding | Enactivism offers resources for critically interrogating habits of affluence that uphold and mask an unsustainable status quo, within a framework of the systematic production of lacunae of emotive concern in society. |
Abstract
In this text, I discuss the role that a range of habits in affluent societies play in upholding as well as masking an unsustainable status quo. I show that enactivism, as a philosophical approach to the embodied and embedded mind, offers resources for bringing into focus and critically interrogating such habits of affluence and the environments enabling them. I do this in the context of a critical theory of the unfelt in society: the systematic production of lacunae of emotive concern in social collectives. The lack of proportionate affective and practical responses to the ecological crisis epitomizes this. The article starts with considerations on societal unfeeling, then reviews key elements of enactive approaches to habit, before a fuller picture of habits of affluence is developed, informed by Brand’s and Wissen’s concept of the imperial mode of living. Finally, two dimensions of habits of affluence are discussed in some detail, which will help flesh out a thematically expanded, politically engaged version of enactivism.