Skip to content

Buildings as macro-cognitive artefacts: Material engagement theory and the architecture of thinking-through-things—The case of Moriyama House

Büşra Dilaveroğlu

Frontiers of Architectural Research March 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2026.01.002 via OpenAlex

Summary

Architecture, rather than being a passive backdrop or symbolic object, actively participates in human cognition. Drawing on Lambros Malafouris's Material Engagement Theory, this analysis argues that buildings function as macro-cognitive artifacts that shape thought and behavior. The study examines Ryue Nishizawa's Moriyama House, a fragmented Tokyo residence, as a case study. It traces five cognitive processes at work: thinking through materials, performing meaning through bodily engagement, co-constituting action between humans and nonhumans, materializing shared goals among heterogeneous actors, and the long-term reciprocal reshaping of inhabitants' habits and the building itself. The analysis uses architectural analysis and frame-by-frame deconstruction of the ethnographic film Moriyama-San to show how these processes create a cognitive habitat.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Architecture Key lock Work physics Term time Architectural engineering
Key finding Architecture operates as a macro-cognitive artifact that actively participates in cognitive life through processes of material engagement, as demonstrated by the Moriyama House.

Abstract

This study redefines the ontological status of architecture through the framework of Lambros Malafouris's Material Engagement Theory (MET). Moving beyond paradigms that treat buildings as passive settings or symbolic forms, it argues that architecture operates as a macro-cognitive artifact—an active, constitutive participant in cognitive life. The investigation centers on Ryue Nishizawa's Moriyama House, a radically fragmented Tokyo residence that serves as an exemplary “theoretical probe” for tracing the dynamics of material engagement in situ. The analysis is structured around five core MET processes that illuminate the archaeology of cognitive behavior—the layered, historical emergence of thought patterns through material forms: (1) Thinging, or thinking-through-materials; (2) Enactive Signification, where meaning (like “privacy” or “gathering”) is not represented but performed through bodily engagement; (3) Participatory Agency, which co-constitutes action within human-nonhuman intra-actions (4) We-Intentionality, where shared goals materialize through triadic intra-actions among heterogeneous actors; and (5) Metaplasticity, the long-term, reciprocal reshaping of inhabitant habits and architectural wear. Employing a hybrid methodology of architectural analysis and frame-by-frame deconstruction of the ethnographic film Moriyama-San, the research demonstrates how these processes coalesce to form a cognitive habitat.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment