Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: Are They Nonconscious, Unconscious, or Subconscious? Expanding the Discussion.
Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts
Brain Sci May 17, 2023 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13050814 via PubMed Central
Summary
The paper argues that current terminology for disorders of consciousness—such as 'nonconscious,' 'unconscious,' and 'subconscious'—carries different conceptual meanings that influence clinical understanding and ethical treatment of patients. It proposes expanding the discussion to consider these distinctions more carefully, suggesting that labeling patients as 'nonconscious' may imply a complete absence of experience, while 'subconscious' could allow for residual awareness. The authors advocate for a more nuanced language that reflects the complexity of consciousness states, aiming to improve both scientific accuracy and compassionate care.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 9 |
| Key finding | The terminology used for disorders of consciousness shapes clinical and ethical perspectives, and a more nuanced discussion of these terms is needed. |
Abstract
Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: Are They Nonconscious, Unconscious, or Subconscious? Expanding the Discussion.