Determination of "new psychoactive substances" in postmortem matrices using microwave derivatization and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Cláudia Margalho, Alice Castanheira, Francisco Corte Real, Eugenia Gallardo, Manuel López-rivadulla
Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences May 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.03.001 via PubMed
Summary
A validated analytical method using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with microwave fast derivatization can detect and quantify 14 psychoactive substances—including synthetic cathinones and phenethylamines—in low volumes of vitreous humor, pericardial fluid, and whole blood. The method showed linear results between 5 and 600 ng/mL, with high precision and accuracy, and extraction efficiencies ranging from 76.6% to 112.8%. It was successfully applied to authentic forensic samples in Portugal.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Validation study Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Authentic forensic samples from the Laboratory of Chemistry and Forensic Toxicology, Centre Branch, National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Portugal |
| Keywords | Alternative biological matrices Cathinones Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry Microwave fast derivatization Phenethylamines |
| Citations | 33 |
| Key finding | A validated method using mixed-mode solid phase extraction, microwave fast derivatization, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry can reliably quantify 14 psychoactive substances in vitreous humor, pericardial fluid, and whole blood. |
Abstract
Despite worldwide efforts aiming to ban the marketing and subsequent abuse of psychoactive substances such as synthetic cathinones and phenethylamines, there has been an alarming growth of both in recent years. Different compounds similar to those already existing are continuously appearing in the market in order to circumvent the legislation. An analytical methodology has been validated for qualitative and quantitative determinations of D-cathine (D-norpseudoehedrine), ephedrine, methcathinone, 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-propan-2-amine (PMA), mephedrone, methedrone, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine (DOB), 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-H), 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-B), 4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-I), 2-[2,5-dimethoxy-4-(ethylthio)phenyl]ethanamine (2C-T-2), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-isopropylthiophenethylamine (2C-T-4) and 2-[2,5-dimethoxy-4-(propylthio)phenyl]ethanamine (2C-T-7), in low volumes of vitreous humor (100 μL), pericardial fluid (250 μL) and whole blood (250 μL), using deutered amphetamine, ephedrine and mephedrone as internal standards. The validation parameters included selectivity, linearity and limits of detection and quantification, intra- and interday precision and trueness, recovery and stability. The method included mixed-mode solid phase extraction, followed by microwave fast derivatization and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry operated in selected ion monitoring mode. The procedure was linear between 5 and 600 ng/mL, with determination coefficients higher than 0.99 for all analytes. Intra- and interday precision ranged from 0.1 to 13.6%, while accuracy variability was within 80-120% interval from the nominal concentration at all studied levels. The extraction efficiencies ranged from 76.6 to 112.8%. Stability was considered acceptable for all compounds in the studied matrices. The developed assay was applied to authentic samples of the Laboratory of Chemistry and Forensic Toxicology, Centre Branch, of the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Portugal.