Skip to content

Modulating dream experience: Noninvasive brain stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex reduces dream movement

Valdas Noreika, Jennifer M. Windt, Markus Kern, Katja Valli, Tiina Salonen, Riitta Parkkola, Antti Revonsuo, Ahmed A. Karim, Tonio Ball, Bigna Lenggenhager

bioRxiv Preprint Server April 12, 2019 preprint DOI: 10.1101/600288 via bioRxiv

Summary

Applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the sensorimotor cortex during REM sleep reduces reported dream movement, particularly repetitive actions, without affecting other bodily sensations like touch or balance. This effect coincides with reduced interhemispheric coherence in parietal areas and altered muscle activity correlation between arms. The findings indicate that tDCS causally interferes with the neural mechanisms underlying dream movement, confirming the spatial specificity of the stimulation site and suggesting a reorganization of the motor network during dreaming.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Randomized controlled trial
Population Participants awakened from REM sleep
Key finding tDCS over the sensorimotor cortex significantly decreased reports of dream movement, especially repetitive actions, without affecting other bodily sensations.

Abstract

Recently, cortical correlates of specific dream contents have been reported, such as the activation of the sensorimotor cortex during dreamed hand clenching. Yet, the causal mechanisms underlying specific dream content remain largely elusive. Here, we investigated how alterations in the excitability of sensorimotor areas through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) might alter dream content. Following bihemispheric tDCS or sham stimulation, participants who were awakened from REM sleep filled out a questionnaire on bodily sensations in dreams. tDCS, compared to sham stimulation, significantly decreased reports of dream movement, especially repetitive actions. Contrary to this, other types of bodily experiences, such as tactile or vestibular sensations, were not affected by tDCS, confirming the specificity of stimulation effects. In addition, tDCS reduced interhemispheric coherence in parietal areas and altered the phasic electromyography correlation between the two arms. These findings reveal that a complex reorganization of the motor network co-occurred with the reduction of dream movement, confirming spatial specificity of the stimulation site. We conclude that tDCS over the sensorimotor cortex causally interferes with dream movement during REM sleep.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment