The acute effects of cannabis, with and without cannabidiol, on attentional bias to cannabis related cues: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study
Daniel L. Hall, Will Lawn, Shelan Ofori, Katie Trinci, Anna Borissova, Claire Mokrysz, Kat Petrilli, Michael Bloomfield, Matthew B. Wall, Tom P. Freeman, H. Valerie Curran
Psychopharmacology February 28, 2024 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06543-7 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAcute intoxication with vaporized THC eliminated attentional bias away from cannabis-related cues in both adolescents and adults who used cannabis 0.5–3 days per week. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study with 48 participants (24 adolescents aged 16–17 and 24 adults aged 26–29), a weight-adjusted dose of 8 mg THC eliminated the bias, while adding 24 mg CBD did not alter this effect. There was no significant difference in response between age groups. The findings suggest that acute THC intoxication shifts attentional processing of cannabis cues, but CBD does not moderate this effect.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 48 |
| Population | Adolescents (aged 16–17) and adults (aged 26–29) who used cannabis 0.5–3 days per week |
| Interventions | THC THC + CBD |
| Dose | 8 mg THC for a 75-kg person; 8 mg THC and 24 mg CBD for a 75-kg person |
| Duration | 3 separate days (single administration per day) |
| Topics | Addiction Cannabis CBD |
| Keywords | Attentional bias Placebo Dronabinol Effects of cannabis |
| Citations | 5 |
| Registration | NCT04851392 |
| Key finding | Acute THC administration eliminated attentional bias away from cannabis cues, with no moderating effect of CBD or difference between adolescents and adults. |
Abstract
RATIONALE: Attentional bias to drug-related stimuli is hypothesised to contribute towards addiction. However, the acute effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on attentional bias to cannabis cues, the differential response in adults and adolescents, and the moderating effect of cannabidiol (CBD) are unknown. OBJECTIVES: Our study investigated (1) the acute effects of vaporised cannabis on attentional bias to cannabis-related images in adults and adolescents and (2) the moderating influences of age and CBD. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study where three weight-adjusted vaporised cannabis preparations: 'THC' (8 mg THC for a 75-kg person), 'THC + CBD' (8 mg THC and 24 mg CBD for a 75-kg person) and PLA (matched placebo). Cannabis was administered on 3 separate days to 48 participants, who used cannabis 0.5-3 days/week: 24 adolescents (12 females, aged 16-17) and 24 adults (12 females, aged 26-29). Participants completed a visual probe task with cannabis cues. Our primary outcome was attentional bias to cannabis stimuli, measured using the differential reaction time to a cannabis vs. neutral probe, on 200-ms trials. RESULTS: = 0.077), indicating THC administration eliminated this bias. There was no significant impact of CBD nor an age-by-drug interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Acute THC intoxication eliminated attentional bias away from cannabis cues. There was no evidence of differential response in adolescents compared to adults and no evidence that a moderate vaporised dose of CBD altered the impact of cannabis on attentional bias. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was listed with the US National Library of Medicine and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, URL: Do Adolescents and Adults Differ in Their Acute Response to Cannabis?-Full Text View-ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04851392.