Skip to content

Split-Brain: What We Know Now and Why This is Important for Understanding Consciousness

Edward H.F. de Haan, Paul M. Corballis, Steven A. Hillyard, Carlo A. Marzi, Anil K. Seth, Victor A. F. Lamme, Lukas J. Volz, Mara Fabri, Elizabeth Schechter, Tim Bayne, Michael C. Corballis, Yair Pinto

Neuropsychology Review May 12, 2020 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-020-09439-3 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Cutting the corpus callosum (split-brain) broadly disrupts functional integration across perception and attention, but some processes like action control remain unified. The key unresolved question is whether split-brain patients have split or unified consciousness. Current evidence is insufficient to decide, and future studies may need to consider intermediate conceptualizations beyond a simple yes or no.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Collective review Peer reviewed
Keywords Consciousness Miller Corpus callosum Psychogenic disease Perspective graphical
Citations 86
Key finding Callosotomy broadly disrupts functional integration but leaves some processes unified; evidence is insufficient to determine whether consciousness is split or unified.

Abstract

Recently, the discussion regarding the consequences of cutting the corpus callosum ("split-brain") has regained momentum (Corballis, Corballis, Berlucchi, & Marzi, Brain, 141(6), e46, 2018; Pinto et al., Brain, 140(5), 1231-1237, 2017a; Pinto, Lamme, & de Haan, Brain, 140(11), e68, 2017; Volz & Gazzaniga, Brain, 140(7), 2051-2060, 2017; Volz, Hillyard, Miller, & Gazzaniga, Brain, 141(3), e15, 2018). This collective review paper aims to summarize the empirical common ground, to delineate the different interpretations, and to identify the remaining questions. In short, callosotomy leads to a broad breakdown of functional integration ranging from perception to attention. However, the breakdown is not absolute as several processes, such as action control, seem to remain unified. Disagreement exists about the responsible mechanisms for this remaining unity. The main issue concerns the first-person perspective of a split-brain patient. Does a split-brain harbor a split consciousness or is consciousness unified? The current consensus is that the body of evidence is insufficient to answer this question, and different suggestions are made with respect to how future studies might address this paucity. In addition, it is suggested that the answers might not be a simple yes or no but that intermediate conceptualizations need to be considered.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment