Skip to content

Mind and Matter

D. M. Appleby

arXiv Preprint Archive May 31, 2013 via arXiv

Summary

The problem of interpreting quantum mechanics and the philosophical problem of consciousness both stem from the same misguided Cartesian assumptions. The analysis details the confusions underlying those assumptions. Rather than suggesting that quantum mechanics might explain consciousness, the argument proposes that an adequate non-Cartesian philosophy would transform our understanding of both quantum mechanics and consciousness, thereby changing what we think needs to be explained.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Physics.hist-ph Mind-body problem Quantum physics quant-ph Philosophy of science
Key finding Both the interpretation of quantum mechanics and the problem of consciousness arise from the same set of misguided Cartesian assumptions, and a non-Cartesian philosophy would transform our understanding of both.

Abstract

It is argued that the problem of interpreting quantum mechanics, and the philosophical problem of consciousness, both have their roots in the same set of misguided Cartesian assumptions. The confusions underlying those assumptions are analyzed in detail. It is sometimes suggested that quantum mechanics might explain consciousness. That is not the suggestion here. Rather it is suggested that an adequate non-Cartesian philosophy would transform our understanding of both quantum mechanics and consciousness. Consequently, it would change our ideas as to just what it is that we are trying to explain.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment