Quantum measurements are physical processes. Comment on "Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments," By Dean Radin et al. [Physics Essays 25, 2 (2012)]
Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi
arXiv Preprint Archive July 3, 2012 via arXiv
Summary
The paper questions whether recent double-slit experiments by Radin and colleagues actually test the influence of the experimenter's mind on quantum wave function collapse. It argues that quantum mechanics already explains measurement processes without invoking psychophysical factors, so parapsychologists should not rely on such interpretations to support psychokinesis claims. Instead, they should seek more plausible explanations for their findings.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Quant-ph Physics.hist-ph Quantum physics Quantum measurement |
| Key finding | Quantum mechanics does not require psychophysical ingredients to explain measurement, so double-slit experiments do not support mind-influenced wave function collapse. |
Abstract
The validity of the assertion that some recent double-slit interference experiments, conducted by Radin et al., would have tested the possible role of the experimenter's mind in the collapse of the quantum wave function, is questioned. It is emphasized that quantum mechanics doesn't need any psychophysical ingredient to explain the measurement processes, and therefore parapsychologists shouldn't resort to the latter to support the possibility of psychokinesis, but search for more convincing explanations.