Skip to content

Patricia Cabrera

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, Titusville, NJ, USA.

3 papers in the library · 38 citations · publishing 2024-2025

Papers

Real-World Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray: A Comprehensive Analysis Almost 5 Years After First Approval.

American Journal of Psychiatry September 10, 2025 Gerard Sanacora, Muhammad Ahmed, Brianne Brown et al. 24 citations

Over nearly five years of real-world use in the United States, esketamine's safety profile remains consistent with clinical trial findings and product labeling. Among 58,483 patients completing 1,486,213 outpatient sessions, sedation occurred in 34.7% of sessions, dissociation in 41.0%, and increased blood pressure in 0.9%. Serious adverse events were rare, reported in less than 0.1% of sessions in the REMS program and 0.18% in the US-GMS database. Suicide rates were lower than background rates, and 210 incidences of all-cause abuse or misuse were reported. No new safety signals were identified.

Esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine XR in adults with treatment-resistant depression: a secondary analysis of the ESCAPE-TRD randomized clinical trial.

CNS spectrums January 17, 2025 Roger S McIntyre, Gregory Mattingly, Yordan Godinov et al. 9 citations

In adults with treatment-resistant depression, esketamine nasal spray combined with an oral antidepressant leads to higher remission rates than quetiapine extended-release combined with an oral antidepressant. Starting at week 8, 28.3% of esketamine-treated patients achieved remission compared to 18.6% on quetiapine, and by week 32, 55.7% versus 36.3%. Depressive symptoms improved more with esketamine from day 8 onward. Fewer patients stopped treatment due to side effects with esketamine (4.5%) than with quetiapine (10.1%). These results come from a secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

Effects of esketamine nasal spray on depressive symptom severity in adults with treatment-resistant depression and associations between the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire.

CNS spectrums June 1, 2024 Jennifer Kern Sliwa, Ronaldo R Naranjo, Ibrahim Turkoz et al. 5 citations

In adults with treatment-resistant depression, adding esketamine nasal spray to a newly initiated oral antidepressant led to greater improvement in depressive symptoms than oral antidepressant plus placebo spray. Across two short-term trials, the group receiving esketamine plus oral antidepressant showed a mean reduction of 12.8 points on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at 28 days, compared with 10.3 points in the placebo group, a statistically significant difference. 77.1% of patients in the esketamine group achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (at least a 6-point drop) versus 64% in the placebo group. In a separate relapse-prevention study, 57.3% of patients on esketamine plus oral antidepressant maintained remission (PHQ-9 score ≤4) versus 44.2% on oral antidepressant plus placebo. The self-reported PHQ-9 results aligned with clinician-rated Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores.