US Institutional Review Board Perspectives Regarding Psychedelic Research
Psychedelic Medicine April 23, 2026 Jill Oliver Robinson, Ruiying (aria) Xiong, Logan Neitzke-Spruill et al.
A survey of 212 US institutional review board (IRB) chairs found that many lack knowledge about psychedelic risks and benefits, with 35–51% reporting gaps. Most chairs expressed neutral attitudes toward psychedelics (35–47%) and similar confidence reviewing psychedelic and nonpsychedelic protocols (61–78%). However, 33–53% reported heightened concern about psychedelic administration research, including legal, employment, and social risks, participant safety, consent challenges, and vulnerable populations. About half (47.2%) saw heightened institutional risk. Most (82.9%) agreed with requiring extensive monitoring of psychedelic sessions, but views on other protections varied widely. The findings suggest IRBs are not broadly conservative but uncertain, with concerns mirroring unsettled issues in the field.