Explore (New York, N.Y.)
January 1, 2024
Jeffrey Long, Marjorie Woollacott
17 citations
People who have had a near-death experience (NDE) undergo a lasting spiritual awakening and shift in life priorities that goes beyond what is seen after other life-threatening events. In a comparison of 834 individuals who had NDEs with 42 who faced life-threatening situations without an NDE, those with NDEs reported a stronger belief in divinity and the afterlife, a decreased fear of death, greater compassion, and a heightened sense that life is meaningful. Their values reoriented toward spiritual and religious life. The findings indicate that the transformation is specific to the NDE itself, not merely a response to nearly dying.
Journal of Near-Death Studies
January 1, 2020
Alinaghi Ghasemiannejad Jahromi, Jeffrey Long
1 citation
Accounts of near-death experiences (NDEs) from seventeen Iranian Shia Muslims show both similarities and differences compared to Western NDE narratives. The thematic analysis reveals that while core elements such as out-of-body sensations, meeting deceased relatives, and a life review appear across cultures, the Iranian accounts uniquely incorporate Islamic religious imagery, including encounters with figures like Imam Ali and descriptions of heaven and hell aligned with Shia eschatology. These findings suggest that cultural and religious background shapes the content and interpretation of NDEs, indicating that the experience is not universal in its details but is filtered through the experiencer's worldview.
July 26, 2025
Bruce Greyson, Jeffrey Long, Janice Holden et al.
preprint
A new scale, the veridical Near-Death Experience Scale (vNDE Scale), was developed to assess how strong the evidence is for perceptions reported during near-death experiences. Experts in near-death experiences reached consensus on eight criteria covering timing, medical conditions, third-party verification, and the type and quality of perceptions, scored on a four-level Likert scale. When 11 human raters and three artificial raters using large language models applied the scale to 17 cases, overall agreement between human and artificial judges exceeded 75% in 14 of the 17 cases (82.3%), considering adjacent levels of evidence strength. The scale offers a practical way to evaluate the evidential strength of such perceptions.