Skip to content

Bilal A. Bari

3 papers in the library · 17 citations · publishing 2022-2026

Papers

A Bayesian Reanalysis of a Trial of Psilocybin Versus Escitalopram for Depression

Psychedelic Medicine October 28, 2022 Bruna Giribaldi, Sandeep M. Nayak, Bilal A. Bari et al. 15 citations

A Bayesian reanalysis of a trial comparing psilocybin (25 mg) to escitalopram (20 mg) over 6 weeks in 59 patients with major depressive disorder found that psilocybin outperformed escitalopram on three of four depression scales, though evidence was not uniformly clinically meaningful. Using skeptical priors that bias results toward zero, the analysis showed strong to extremely strong evidence favoring psilocybin on the BDI-1A, MADRS, and HAMD-17, while evidence on the primary outcome (QIDS SR-16) was indeterminate. For clinically meaningful superiority, evidence was moderate against it for the QIDS SR-16 but moderate to strong for the MADRS and HAMD-17. Psilocybin showed extremely strong evidence of noninferiority to escitalopram across all scales. The findings support further research on psilocybin's relative efficacy.

Trip sitting or just sitting? Session facilitators substantially influence psychedelic experiences in clinical trials but not in healthy ones

Psychiatry Research February 13, 2026 Sean P. Goldy, Nathan D. Sepeda, Samantha Hilbert et al. 1 citation

The acute subjective effects of psychedelics are known to predict therapeutic benefits like reduced depression and anxiety. Session facilitators—who support participants before, during, and after dosing—are a key part of the setting, but their influence on subjective effects was unclear. Analyzing data from 9 psilocybin studies with 298 participants, 670 sessions, and 60 facilitators, multilevel models showed facilitators accounted for negligible variance (0.8%) in healthy volunteers but greater variance in clinical samples (13.6%), after controlling for study and participant differences. This suggests facilitators may play a clinically meaningful role in shaping outcomes for patient populations, comparable to or exceeding therapist effects in traditional psychotherapy (~8%).

A Bayesian Reanalysis of a Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression

June 30, 2022 Sandeep M. Nayak, Bilal A. Bari, David B. Yaden et al. 1 citation preprint

A Bayesian reanalysis of a trial comparing psilocybin (COMP360) to escitalopram for major depressive disorder found that psilocybin outperformed escitalopram, but not by a clinically meaningful amount. The analysis also found extremely strong evidence that psilocybin is non-inferior to escitalopram. Evidence for psilocybin's superiority varied by depression scale: indeterminate for one, strong for two, and extremely strong for another. For a clinically meaningful difference, evidence was moderate against it on one scale, indeterminate on two, and moderate supporting it on one. These results provide a more nuanced interpretation and support further research.