This article critically analyzes Schoff and Claude's proposal that mental imagery is a physical-informational phenomenon, not a subjective illusion, by comparing it with the Theory of Objectivity. It argues the proposal offers an operational bridge for understanding interior-domain experience as compatible with the TO thesis that transcendent knowledge is information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The analysis identifies tensions in the article's neurobiological focus, speculative use of concepts like FSR Spectrum and Dimension-W, and its failure to replace the complete cosmogonic theorem of the Theory of Objectivity.
This article critically examines Hugang Cui's Spacetime Substantivalism 0: The Track-Light Model, which proposes a Logical Matrix as the universal source and a new foundation for metaphysics, comparing it with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The analysis finds Cui's model philosophically significant for restoring logical-ontological anteriority and attempting to overcome mind-body dualism through a common source. However, decisive tensions emerge between Cui's logical substantivalism and TO's modal discipline, particularly regarding individuation, boundary lines, minimal relational observation, infinity as non-element, and the need for a transcendent substance beyond the quantum domain. The article concludes that Cui's model is a high-level logicist interlocutor, genuinely relevant to TO's aims but only partially compatible with its full modal and cosmogonic framework.