Skip to content

Effect of mindfulness-based intervention in patients with diabetes: a meta-analytic review.

Carlos Said Páez-márquez, Elkin Higuera-Dagovett, Jaime Tomás Rojas-Valencia

Psychology, health & medicine April 15, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2025.2487948 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) modestly improve blood sugar control and mental health in people with diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials involving 987 participants found that, at follow-up (12–20 weeks), MBIs reduced glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by an average of 0.5 percentage points and lowered depression scores. The evidence suggests that mindfulness training—helping patients accept sensations and emotions without automatic reactivity—can complement standard diabetes care. The authors call for further research to confirm these effects and understand how MBIs fit into comprehensive diabetes treatment.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 987
Population Patients diagnosed with diabetes
Intervention mindfulness-based interventions
Duration 12–20 weeks follow-up
Keywords Diabetes mellitus Diabetes complications Mindfulness-based stress reduction
Citations 1
Key finding Mindfulness-based interventions reduced HbA1c by 0.5 percentage points and lowered depression scores at 12–20 weeks follow-up.

Abstract

Traditional management strategies for diabetes primarily focus on behavioural risk factors and pharmacological therapies. Furthermore, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) aim to assist patients in recognising and accepting sensations, emotions and cognitions without automatic reactivity. This approach can potentially enhance glycaemic control and mental health in diabetic patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effects of MBIs among individuals diagnosed with diabetes. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were conducted following international quality standards utilised by the Cochrane Collaboration. Randomised controlled trials were included. The population of interest was defined as any patient diagnosed with diabetes; MBIs were defined as the intervention. Pubmed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Lilacs were accessed. A grey literature search was performed using OpenGrey and ClinicalTrials tools. Outcomes included changes in glycosylated haemoglobin percentage (%HbA1c), depression, and stress scores. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and publication bias was evaluated through Egger's test. The results were presented with forest plots. The mean difference (MD) for the %HbA1c and the standardised MD for the measurement scale scores were used as effect measures. The initial search retrieved 442 scientific articles, 11 randomised clinical trials were finally selected for the systematic review, which included 987 participants (487 in the intervention groups), and seven articles were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that MBIs had effects at follow-up (between 12 and 20 weeks) in reducing %HbA1c levels (MD = -0.5, CI 95% [-0.67, -0.34]) and depression SMD = -0.84, CI 95% [-1.11, -0.56]). It is proposed that mindfulness significantly enhances mental health and glycaemic control in patients with diabetes. Further research is warranted to confirm these effects and gain a deeper understanding of the contribution of MBIs in comprehensive diabetes treatment.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment