Mindfulness-based interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Carolyn C Ee, Ieman Al-Kanini, Mike Armour, Milan K Piya, Rita McMorrow, Vibhuti S Rao, Dhevaksha Naidoo, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Cynthia M Kroeger, Angelo Sabag
Integrative medicine research June 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101138 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMindfulness-based interventions may reduce stress, depression, and anxiety in adults with type 2 diabetes, and may produce a small improvement in blood sugar control (HbA1c) and blood pressure, but the evidence is very low to low certainty. A meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials with 2,337 participants found that mindfulness programs compared to waitlist or usual care were associated with reductions in stress, depression, and anxiety at the end of treatment. Mindfulness plus lifestyle changes showed no additional benefit for blood sugar or body weight over lifestyle changes alone. The low certainty of the evidence prevents firm clinical recommendations.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review with meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 2,337 |
| Population | Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus |
| Intervention | Mindfulness-based interventions |
| Duration | End of treatment |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Integrative medicine Meta-analysis Mindfulness meditation Diabetes management Clinical research |
| Citations | 12 |
| Key finding | Mindfulness-based interventions may reduce psychological distress and modestly improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes, but the evidence is too uncertain to support clinical recommendations. |
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can lead to macro- and microvascular complications. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) may improve metabolic and psychological health in individuals with T2DM. We aimed to assess the efficacy of MBIs for management of T2DM. We searched five databases and two trial registries using a comprehensive search strategy developed by a multidisciplinary team including an information scientist. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating MBIs for important clinical outcomes including psychological outcomes, quality of life, glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in adults with T2DM. Where possible, random effects meta-analyses were conducted. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess certainty of the evidence. We included 31 RCTs (2337 participants: 1107 intervention, 1230 control). We found very low certainty evidence that MBIs may reduce stress (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.01, confidence interval (CI) -1.91 to -0.20, 8 trials, n = 528), depression (SMD -1.26, CI -2.08 to -0.43; 7 trials, n = 570) and anxiety (SMD -0.67, CI -1.27 to -0.08; 4 studies, n = 255) at end of treatment compared to waitlist control/usual care. MBIs may have a small effect on HbA1c and systolic/diastolic blood pressure at end of treatment compared to waitlist control/usual care (HbA1c mean difference (MD) -0.44, 95 % CI -0.71 to -0.17, 9 trials, n = 734; low certainty evidence). There was very low certainty evidence that MBIs + lifestyle may have no effect on HbA1c or body weight compared to lifestyle alone. MBIs may have clinical benefits (particularly psychological) for adults with T2DM, but lack of certainty in the evidence precludes clinical recommendations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014881.