Skip to content

Adolescents do not benefit from universal school-based mindfulness interventions: a reanalysis of Dunning et al. (2022).

Brian Galla, Aishwarya Karanam, Avital Pelakh, Simon B Goldberg

Frontiers in psychology January 1, 2024 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384531 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A reanalysis of 22 randomized controlled trials (16,558 adolescents) found that universal school-based mindfulness interventions do not reliably improve adolescent mental health. Compared to passive controls, mindfulness training actually reduced trait mindfulness slightly (d = -0.10). Compared to active controls, it improved anxiety/stress (d = 0.17) and wellbeing (d = 0.10), but against all controls combined, no outcomes—including anxiety, depression, attention, or social behavior—showed significant benefit (effect sizes ranged from 0.01 to 0.26). No effects persisted at follow-up. These results question the value of existing school-based mindfulness programs as a universal prevention strategy for adolescents.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Reanalysis of meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 16,558
Population Adolescents from randomized controlled trials of universal school-based mindfulness interventions
Intervention school-based mindfulness interventions
Duration Immediate post-test and longest follow-up
Topics Meditation
Keywords Adolescent Meta-analysis Prevention Universal intervention
Citations 13
Key finding Universal school-based mindfulness interventions did not significantly improve any outcome when compared to all controls combined, and no effects were observed at follow-up.

Abstract

Are universal school-based mindfulness interventions an effective way to reduce risk for mental disorders and improve adolescents' lives? To answer this question, we reanalyzed data from Dunning et al.'s (2022) meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mindfulness interventions delivered to children and adolescents. Though Dunning et al. (2022) reported some benefits of universal mindfulness interventions, their analysis did not examine adolescents separately from children. Consequently, their conclusions may not entirely reflect the effectiveness of universal mindfulness interventions specifically for adolescents, a developmental period when mental disorders are known to increase. Using their open-access data tables, we tested impacts of 22 randomized controlled trials (N = 16,558) on eight outcome categories-anxiety/stress, attention, depression, executive functioning, mindfulness, negative behavior, social behavior, and wellbeing-at immediate post-test and longest follow-up. Our reanalysis shows that when compared to passive controls, mindfulness interventions significantly reduced trait mindfulness (d = -0.10). When compared to active controls, mindfulness interventions significantly improved anxiety/stress (d = 0.17) and wellbeing (d = 0.10). When compared to all controls combined, mindfulness interventions did not significantly improve any outcome (ds = 0.01 to 0.26). No effects of mindfulness interventions were observed at follow-up assessment. Overall, results of our analysis cast doubt about the value of existing school-based mindfulness interventions as a universal prevention strategy for adolescents.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment