Skip to content

Consciousness Under the Spotlight: The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience.

Mikel Jimenez, Antonio Prieto, José Antonio Hinojosa, Pedro R Montoro

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1697 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The study of consciousness faces unique challenges because it investigates subjective experience, which is accessible only from a first-person perspective, unlike objective third-person phenomena in other sciences. This article reviews historical and contemporary efforts to measure consciousness and its absence, focusing on two main approaches: objective performance-based measures and subjective report-based measures of awareness. It compares their advantages and disadvantages, evaluates them against methodological criteria, and discusses transforming both into a common sensitivity measure (d') for comparison. New approaches are explored, including Bayesian models to support claims of absent awareness and machine-learning decoding models, alongside future challenges such as measuring qualia—the qualitative contents of awareness.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Review Qualitative Peer reviewed
Keywords Awareness measure Consciousness Subjective/objective awareness threshold Unconscious perception
Citations 16
Key finding Objective and subjective measures of awareness each have distinct advantages and disadvantages, and comparing them via a common sensitivity measure (d') is possible, while new Bayesian and machine-learning approaches offer promising paths for future consciousness research.

Abstract

The study of consciousness is considered by many one of the most difficult contemporary scientific endeavors and confronts several methodological and theoretical challenges. A central issue that makes the study of consciousness so challenging is that, while the rest of science is concerned with problems that can be verified from a "third person" view (i.e., objectively), the study of consciousness deals with the phenomenon of subjective experience, only accessible from a "first person" view. In the present article, we review early (starting during the late 19th century) and later efforts on measuring consciousness and its absence, focusing on the two main approaches used by researchers within the field: objective (i.e., performance based) and subjective (i.e., report based) measures of awareness. In addition, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of both types of awareness measures, evaluate them according to different methodological considerations, and discuss, among other issues, the possibility of comparing them by transforming them to a common sensitivity measure (d'). Finally, we explore several new approaches-such as Bayesian models to support the absence of awareness or new machine-learning based decoding models-as well as future challenges-such as measuring the qualia, the qualitative contents of awareness-in consciousness research.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment