The Relation Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Visual Awareness: Current Evidence, Attempt of a Synthesis and Future Research Directions.
Journal of cognition January 1, 2024 DOI: 10.5334/joc.381 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractIn consciousness research, subjective measures (reports of sensory experience) and objective measures (performance on detection or discrimination tasks) are both used to assess visual awareness. While subjective measures sometimes lag behind objective ones, many studies show they converge. Five aspects relevant to achieving convergence are identified, and future work should test the boundary conditions under which convergence or divergence occurs.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Awareness ratings Consciousness Objective measures Psychophysics Subjective measures |
| Key finding | Subjective and objective measures of visual awareness often converge, though subjective measures can lag behind objective measures. |
Abstract
Within the realm of consciousness research, different methods of measuring the content of visual awareness are used: On the one hand, subjective measures require a report of sensory experiences related to a stimulus. On the other hand, objective measures rely on the observer's performance to accurately detect or discriminate the stimulus. The most appropriate measure of awareness is currently debated. To contribute to this debate, we review findings on the relation between subjective and objective measures of awareness. Although subjective measures sometimes lag behind objective measures, a substantial number of studies demonstrates a convergence of measures. Based on the reviewed studies, we identify five aspects relevant for achieving a convergence of measures. Future research could then identify and empirically test the boundary conditions, under which a convergence or divergence of subjective and measures of awareness is observed.