Skip to content

Mindfulness-based Practices in Workers to Address Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Quentin Durand-Moreau, Tanya Jackson, Danika Deibert, Charl Els, Janice Y Kung, Sebastian Straube

Safety and health at work September 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.07.006 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A systematic review of two randomized controlled trials found no strong evidence that mindfulness-based practices produce lasting, meaningful improvements in mental health for workers diagnosed with mental health conditions. In one trial, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) alone led to a marginal improvement in depression scores (standardized mean difference: -0.06) but worse anxiety scores (0.15) at 9 months; combining ACT with a workplace dialogue intervention showed no statistically significant changes. The other trial found no significant difference between mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. Heterogeneity across studies prevented a combined meta-analysis.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 2
Population Workers diagnosed with a mental health condition
Interventions Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Workplace Dialogue Intervention mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
Duration 9-month follow-up
Topics Meditation
Keywords Mental health Occupational groups Systematic review
Key finding The systematic review did not find evidence that mindfulness-based practices provide a durable and substantial improvement of mental health outcomes in workers diagnosed with mental health conditions.

Abstract

The effectiveness of mindfulness techniques in addressing mental health conditions in workers is uncertain. However, it could represent a therapeutic tool for workers presenting with such conditions. Our objective was to assess the effects of mindfulness-based practices for workers diagnosed with mental health conditions. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Participants included were workers with a mental health condition. Interventions included any mindfulness technique, compared to any nonmindfulness interventions. Outcomes were scores on validated psychiatric rating scales. A total of 4,407 records were screened; 202 were included for full-text analysis; 2 studies were included. The first study (Finnes et al., 2017) used Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) associated or not with Workplace Dialogue Intervention (WDI), compared to treatment as usual. At 9 months follow-up, for the ACT group, depression scores improved marginally (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.06, p = 0.021), but anxiety scores were worse (SMD: 0.15, p = 0.036). Changes in mental health outcomes were not statistically significant for the ACT + WDI group. In the second study (Grensman et al., 2018), no statistically significant change in mental health scales has been observed after completion of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy compared to cognitive behavioral therapy. Substantial heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. This systematic review did not find evidence that mindfulness-based practices provide a durable and substantial improvement of mental health outcomes in workers diagnosed with mental health conditions.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment