Debunking the myth of 'Blue Mondays': No evidence of affect drop after taking clinical MDMA.
Ben Sessa, Jacob S Aday, Steve O’Brien, H Valerie Curran, Fiona Measham, Laurie Higbed, David J Nutt
J Psychopharmacol December 13, 2021 DOI: 10.1177/02698811211055809 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAn open-label study of 14 participants found that mood remained positive during the week after receiving MDMA in a clinical setting, contrary to the 'Blue Monday' crash reported by recreational users. Self-reported sleep quality improved at 3- and 6-month follow-ups compared to baseline. No participants used or desired to use illicit MDMA, and anecdotal reports were favorable. The findings suggest that negative after-effects previously associated with MDMA may stem from confounds such as illicit drug sourcing and recreational settings, rather than the drug itself.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Open-label study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 14 |
| Population | Participants receiving clinically administered MDMA |
| Interventions | 3 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) as an adjunct to psychotherapy |
| Duration | 1-week post-administration follow-up for mood; 3- and 6-month follow-ups for sleep quality |
| Topics | MDMA |
| Keywords | 3 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine Emotional state |
| Citations | 18 |
| Key finding | Participants maintained a positive mood during the week following clinical MDMA administration, with no reported illicit use or desire for it. |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Incorporating 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) as an adjunct to psychotherapy has shown promise in recent years for treating various mental health conditions, particularly those involving trauma. However, concerns about declines in mood and cognition during the days following dosing, also known as 'Blue Mondays', have been raised as limitations to its clinical use. Although these changes have been well-documented among recreational users, there are critical confounds to these reports that limit generalizability to clinically administered MDMA. AIMS: Here, we aimed to evaluate the evidence basis for the negative side effects associated with MDMA as well as inform our understanding of the drug's post-acute effects in a clinical context with an open-label study. METHODS: = 14) and measured mood, sleep quality, illicit MDMA consumption and anecdotal reports after the acute drug effects had worn off. RESULTS: Participants maintained a positive mood during the week following drug administration in a clinical context. Relative to baseline, self-reported sleep quality improved at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Finally, no participants reported using or desiring to use illicit MDMA, and the anecdotal reports indicated that they perceived the treatment favourably. CONCLUSION: The results support the overall safety and tolerability of clinically administered MDMA and, importantly, suggest that the 'come downs' previously associated with the substance may be explained by confounds in research relating to the illicit sourcing of the drug and specific environmental setting for recreational consumption.