We are the Sensors of Consciousness! A Review and Analysis on How Awakenings During Sleep Influence Dream Recall.
Nature and science of sleep January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S506461 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA review of 69 awakening studies from 2000 to 2024 found that how people are awakened and their personal traits strongly affect whether they recall dreams or thoughts upon waking. Recall rates were lower when an alarm was used compared to calling a participant's name, and recall decreased over multiple study days. People awakened at home reported more experiences than those in a lab. Participant characteristics beyond age and sex, such as openness to experience, also influenced recall. These factors can alter study outcomes, including the identification of neural correlates of consciousness, so greater attention to awakening methods and participant traits is needed.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Dreaming Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Attention Experience Serial awakenings |
| Citations | 6 |
| Key finding | Method of awakening, number of study days, sleep environment, and participant characteristics significantly influence dream recall upon awakening. |
Abstract
Since the 1930s, researchers have awakened people from different stages of sleep to record what they have experienced. While some aspects, including asking whether participants had dreams or thoughts before awakening, largely remain the same, others, such as the method of awakening, vary greatly. In addition, it is often assumed that the influence of participant characteristics, such as personality traits, motivation, memory, and attention, is reduced by collecting experiences immediately after they occur, rather than through delayed morning recall. However, the extent to which these variables influence dream recall upon awakening has not yet been thoroughly investigated. To explore possible contextual and individual influences, this review analyzed 69 awakening studies conducted between 2000 and 2024 and utilized the DREAM database. Differences between sleep stages were quantified and experiences analyzed using the categories "with recall", "without recall", and "no report". Similar levels of null reports were found in NREM stage 2 and stage 3. Significant factors affecting dream recall included the method of awakening (lower recall with an alarm compared to calling the participant's name), the number of study days (reduced recall for multiple days) and the sleep environment (higher recall at home compared to the laboratory), along with participant characteristics beyond age, sex and study design. Recall rates from NREM sleep are particularly sensitive to the method of awakening and interindividual differences. Both the awakening procedure and participant characteristics influence the amount of reported sleep experiences, which can impact study outcomes, such as the identification of neural correlates of consciousness. Therefore, greater emphasis needs to be placed on how experiences are collected and on participant characteristics, such as openness to experience or familiarity with different states of consciousness.