Mindfulness and psychotic-like experiences in nonclinical populations: a systematic review and two meta-analyses.
Katrina Mysko, Elise Quarterman Gear, Lyn Ellett
Psychological medicine February 4, 2026 DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725103061 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA systematic review and meta-analysis found a small negative association between trait mindfulness and psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in nonclinical populations, meaning higher mindfulness levels are linked to fewer PLEs. However, mindfulness-based interventions showed no significant effect on reducing PLEs in these populations. The pooled correlation from eight studies was -0.25, and the summary effect from five intervention studies was not significant. The findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the small number of studies and high heterogeneity.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review and meta-analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 17 |
| Population | Nonclinical populations |
| Intervention | mindfulness-based interventions |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Meta-analysis Nonclinical populations Psychotic-like experiences Systematic review |
| Key finding | Higher trait mindfulness is associated with fewer psychotic-like experiences, but mindfulness-based interventions did not significantly reduce these experiences in nonclinical populations. |
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analyses provide the first synthesis of the literature on trait mindfulness and psychotic-like experiences (PLEs). Theoretical models suggest a protective function of mindfulness and it is important to understand any potential role of mindfulness in the prevention and treatment of PLEs. We examined the following: (1) What is the relationship between trait mindfulness and PLEs in nonclinical populations?; and (2) What is the effect of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on PLEs in nonclinical populations? Five databases were searched, and effect sizes were extracted for each study. Seventeen papers were included in the review. Eleven papers explored the relationship between mindfulness and PLEs, and the meta-regression found a small negative association between PLEs and mindfulness (k = 8; pooled correlation r = -0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.37, -0.13, p < .001). Eight studies investigated the effect of MBIs on PLEs and the summary effect was not significant in the meta-analysis (k = 5; pooled standard mean difference = .09; 95% CI: -0.61, 0.79, p = 0.80). Overall, the findings suggest that higher levels of mindfulness are associated with reduced PLEs, with no evidence for the effectiveness of MBIs in reducing PLEs. Findings should be interpreted cautiously given the small number of studies and high heterogeneity in the meta-analyses. Future studies are needed to determine whether MBIs might prevent the transition to psychosis or an at-risk mental state and might usefully measure a broader range of clinically relevant outcomes.