Comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of Δ9-THC and psilocybin in rats
Isaac Greenberg, D. M. Kuhn, James B. Appel
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior September 1, 1975 DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(75)90131-8 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMale albino rats learned to press either a left or right lever depending on which drug they had received 30 minutes earlier. One group discriminated between 1.9 mg/kg of delta9-THC and a vehicle control; another group discriminated between 1.0 mg/kg of delta9-THC and 1.0 mg/kg of psilocybin. The results confirmed that delta9-THC can serve as a discriminative stimulus controlling behavior. Because rats reliably chose different levers after delta9-THC versus psilocybin, the two drugs likely produce distinct internal states in rats.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental animal study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Male albino rats |
| Interventions | delta9-THC psilocybin |
| Dose | 1.9 mg/kg of delta9-THC; 1.0 mg/kg of delta9-THC; 1.0 mg/kg of psilocybin |
| Duration | 30 min before experimentation |
| Topics | Psilocybin |
| Keywords | Stimulus control Lever Discriminative model Stimulus psychology |
| Citations | 17 |
| Key finding | Delta9-THC and psilocybin produce discriminably different internal states in rats, as shown by differential lever choice. |
Abstract
Male albino rats were trained to respond differentially on the left or right lever in a 2-lever chamber on the basis of which drug had been given intra-peritoneally (IP) 30 min before experimentation. In 1 group 1.9 mg/kg of delta9-THC and control injections (vehicle) served as the discriminative stimuli associated with each lever and in another group the drug stimuli were 1.0 mg/kg of delta9-THC and 1.0 mg/kg of psilocybin. The results confirmed those of other experiments using different procedures; that delta9-THC can acquire discriminative control over responding. The fact that delta9-THC and psilocybin were also found to differentially control lever choice demonstrates that these 2 drugs probably produce discriminably different states in rats.