Skip to content

The effects of d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), pentobarbital and methaqualone on punished responding in control and 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine-treated rats

Randall L. Commissaris, William H. Lyness, Richard H. Rech

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior May 1, 1981 DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90121-0 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The effects of hallucinogens (LSD and DOM) on punished behavior in rats differ from those of sedatives (pentobarbital and methaqualone), and this difference depends on serotonin (5-HT) neurons. Pentobarbital and methaqualone produced large increases (400-600% of control) in punished responding with little decrease in water intake, while hallucinogens produced only moderate increases (125-175% of control) and similarly depressed unpunished responding. Destroying serotonin neurons with a neurotoxin blocked the hallucinogens' effect on punished responding but did not alter the effects of pentobarbital or methaqualone. The hallucinogens' capacity to decrease water intake was also potentiated by serotonin neuron destruction, indicating that serotonin involvement distinguishes these drug classes.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Population Water-deprived rats
Interventions d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) 2 5-methoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) pentobarbital (PB) methaqualone (MQ) 5
Duration Daily 10-minute control sessions
Topics LSD Psilocybin Serotonin
Keywords Hallucinogen Pentobarbital Chemistry
Citations 29
Key finding The effects of hallucinogens (LSD and DOM) on conditioned suppression depend on serotonin neurons, whereas those of pentobarbital and methaqualone do not.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of central 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) neuronal systems in the effects of d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 2,5-methoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), pentobarbital (PB) and methaqualone (MQ) on punished responding in rats. Water-deprived rats were trained to drink from a tube that was electrified at intervals (variable interval 21 sec; 0.03 mA current intensity), electrification being signalled by a tone. In daily 10-min control sessions, these animals accepted a relatively constant number of shocks; water consumption was also quite stable. At maximally effective doses PB, and to a lesser extent MQ, produced large (400-600 percent of control) increases in punished responding with little decrease in water intake. Higher doses of these agents produced a significant depression of unpunished responding (water intake). The hallucinogens, on the other hand, produced only moderate (125-175 percent of control) increases in the number of shock received, yet a similar depression of unpunished responding. Selective destruction of 5-HT neurons by intracerebroventricular administration of the neurotoxin 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine per se produced little change in the number of shocks received or water consumed in controls sessions. This destruction of 5-HT neurons failed to alter the effects of PB or MQ on punished or unpunished responding. The increase in punished responding produced by the hallucinogens, however, was blocked by this destruction of 5-HT neurons. Furthermore, the capacity of the hallucinogens to decrease water intake was significantly potentiated by the neurotoxin pretreatment. These data demonstrate that the effects of the hallucinogens LSD and DOM on conditioned suppression are quite different from those of PB and MQ, and that this difference may be due to the extent of 5-HT involvement in the effects of these agents.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment