Interactions of metergoline with diazepam, quipazine, and hallucinogenic drugs on a conflict behavior in the rat
Psychopharmacology March 1, 1982 DOI: 10.1007/bf00432562 via Springer Nature
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractDiazepam dramatically increased punished responding in rats, while the hallucinogens LSD and DOM produced only modest increases, and quipazine had no significant effect. Metergoline pretreatment did not affect punished responding or alter diazepam's effects, but it antagonized LSD's weak increase. Diazepam, quipazine, LSD, and DOM all decreased unpunished responding in a dose-dependent manner. Metergoline shifted the dose-response curves for quipazine and DOM rightward but shifted diazepam's curve leftward. These results suggest that changes in brain serotonin activity do not underlie diazepam's large effect on punished behavior, and that the drugs reduce unpunished responding through different neuropharmacological mechanisms.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Food-deprived rats |
| Interventions | Diazepam Quipazine LSD DOM Metergoline |
| Dose | 0.1–2.0 mg/kg |
| Topics | LSD |
| Keywords | Dom Quipazine Diazepam 5-hydroxytryptamine |
| Key finding | Diazepam caused large increases in punished responding, while hallucinogens produced modest increases and quipazine had no significant effect; metergoline antagonized LSD's effect but not diazepam's. |
Abstract
The effects of diazepam quipazine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) were examined on a conditioned suppression paradigm. Food-deprived rats were trained to drink a liquid diet from a tube. Subsequently, intermittent 7-s tones were presented during the daily 10-min sessions, the tube being electrified during the last 5 s of each tone. The subject gradually learned to suppress contact with the tube during the tone periods to a low stable level (punished responding) and consumed stable volumes of the liquid diet during the silent periods (unpunished responding). Treatment with diazepam caused large increases (1,000% of control) in punished responding. The hallucinogens produced only modest increases (200–300%), while quipazine did not significantly increase punished responding. Metergoline pretreatment (0.1–2.0 mg/kg, 180 min) had no effect on punished responding itself, and there was no significant alteration of the diazepam dose-response pattern. The weak increase in punished responding by LSD was antagonized by metergoline, but the interaction between metergoline and DOM was variable and inconsistent. Diazepam, quipazine, LSD, and DOM caused dose-dependent decreases in unpunished responding (fluid intake). Metergoline alone decreased unpunished responding only at 2.0 mg/kg. Metergoline pretreatment (1.0 mg/kg) only slightly antagonized the LSD effect on unpunished behavior, but shifted the dose-response curves of DOM and quipazine for decrease in fluid intake to the right approximately eight fold. On the contrary, the dose-response curve of diazepam to decrease fluid intake was shifted to the left by metergoline pretreatment. These data suggest that altered activity of brain serotonin (5-HT) neurons is not responsible for the dramatic increase in punished responding by diazepam. The hallucinogens, quipazine, and diazepam all produce a decrease in unpunished responding, but they appear to do so by different neuropharmacological mechanisms. In addition, there may be at least slight differences in the mechanism by which LSD produces its effects as compared with that of quipazine and DOM.