Personal Psychedelic Use Is Common Among a Sample of Psychedelic Therapists: Implications for Research and Practice
Zachary Skiles, Noa Eaton, Lisa Fredenburg, Mollie Pleet, Jessica Mantia, Jacob S. Aday, Ellen Bradley, Gisele Fernandes‐osterhold, Joshua Woolley
Psychedelic Medicine February 16, 2023 DOI: 10.1089/psymed.2022.0004 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMost psychedelic therapists in a Usona Institute trial for psilocybin and major depressive disorder had personal experience with psychedelics: 88% had used at least one serotonergic psychedelic, most commonly psilocybin (81%), with a median of 2–10 uses and last use 6–12 months before the survey. The sample was predominantly white, female, and held doctoral degrees. All endorsed favorable views of psilocybin therapy. Experiential learning is common in psychotherapy but not psychiatry, placing psychedelic therapy between two traditions. The study was limited by a low response rate (22%) and lack of diversity. These first data on professionals' personal use inform the debate on whether such experience aids competency or introduces bias.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Survey Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 32 |
| Population | Therapists associated with Usona Institute's Phase II clinical trial of psilocybin for major depressive disorder |
| Keywords | Sample material Psychotherapist Clinical psychology |
| Citations | 49 |
| Key finding | Personal experience with psychedelics was notably common among psychedelic therapists, with 88% having used at least one serotonergic psychedelic. |
Abstract
Background: An emerging controversy in psychedelic therapy regards the appropriateness or necessity of psychedelic therapists having personal experience using psychedelics themselves. Although there are a number of potential advantages and disadvantages to personal use among psychedelic therapists, no studies to date have measured their use or other aspects of their training. Materials and Methods: First, we broadly review the literature on experiential learning in psychotherapy and psychiatry as well as the history of personal use of psychedelics by professionals. We then report on the results of a survey that was sent to all 145 therapists associated with Usona Institute's Phase II clinical trial of psilocybin for major depressive disorder. Thirty-two of these individuals (22% response rate) participated in the survey. Results: We found that experiential learning is common in psychotherapy but not in psychiatry, meaning psychedelic therapy straddles two different traditions. In our survey, the majority of psychedelic therapists identified as white, female, and having doctoral degrees. Most of the sample had personal experience with at least one serotonergic psychedelic (28/32; 88%), with psilocybin being most common (26/32; 81%; median number of uses = 2–10; median last use 6–12 months before survey). Participants had myriad intentions for using psychedelics (e.g., personal development, spiritual growth, fun, curiosity). All respondents endorsed favorable views regarding the efficacy of psilocybin therapy. Conclusion: Personal experience with psychedelics was notably common in this sample of psychedelic therapists, but the study was limited by a low response rate and a lack of diversity among participants. Future research is needed to address these limitations as well as to identify whether personal experience with psychedelics contributes to therapists' competency or introduces bias to the field. Nonetheless, these findings are the first to delineate the personal use of psychedelics among professionals and can inform a pressing debate for the field.