Skip to content

The Emerging Role of Ketamine and Esketamine in the Concurrent Management of Pain and Depression in Cancer Patients: Evidence and Implications for Practice

Shannon Moriarty, Anna Dushenkov, Kathleen M. Frey

Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy December 27, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2607541 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Ketamine and its S-enantiomer esketamine, which modulate glutamate via N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism, may simultaneously relieve pain and depression in cancer patients, conditions usually treated separately. A review of ten clinical studies from 2018 to 2024 found promising but mixed evidence. Two randomized controlled trials in post-surgical breast and cervical cancer patients showed intravenous esketamine and racemic ketamine improved both pain and depression, with esketamine providing greater and longer-lasting benefit.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Review Randomized Peer reviewed
Population Cancer patients with concurrent pain and depression
Topics Depression Ketamine
Keywords Adverse effect Depression economics Dosing
Key finding Ketamine and esketamine show potential for concurrent relief of cancer-related pain and depression, with esketamine demonstrating greater and longer-lasting dual benefit in some trials, though evidence is heterogeneous.

Abstract

Cancer patients frequently experience pain and depression, yet current guidelines address these conditions separately and do not recommend a single agent for concurrent management. Ketamine and its S-enantiomer esketamine, through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism and glutamate modulation, may offer dual benefit. This paper examined ten clinical studies published between 2018 and 2024 evaluating ketamine and esketamine for concurrent cancer-related pain and depression. Evidence was heterogeneous but promising. Two randomized controlled trials in post-surgical breast and cervical cancer patients demonstrated that intravenous (IV) esketamine and racemic ketamine improved both pain and depression, with esketamine showing greater, longer-lasting benefit. When pain was the primary outcome, results were mixed: IV esketamine provided dual benefit in one trial, whereas racemic ketamine produced variable or nonsignificant effects across IV, intranasal (IN), and oral routes. In depression-focused studies, IV and IN administration consistently improved mood, even without pain relief. Dose-response relationships were observed, with esketamine outperforming ketamine and higher IN dosing yielding stronger antidepressant effects. Adverse effects were generally mild and transient, though cardiovascular, urinary, and cognitive risks remain concerns. With rapid dual action, ketamine and esketamine may serve as valuable adjunctive therapies in palliative care. Further studies should clarify optimal dosing, route, and long-term safety.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment