Skip to content

Integrating Psychiatric, Psychotherapeutic, and Nursing Care in Intranasal Esketamine for Treatment-Resistant Depression

Vassilis Martiadis, Fabiola Raffone, Serena Testa, Concetta Iaccarino, P. Giunnelli, Ada Orrico, Emilia Carbone, S Clemente, Carmine de Simone, A. Massa, Clemente Purcaro, Azzurra Martini, Enrico Pessina, C Cattaneo

Journal of Clinical Medicine February 20, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/jcm15041629 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Intranasal esketamine provides rapid symptom relief for treatment-resistant depression when standard antidepressants fail, but its real-world effectiveness depends on organizational and multidisciplinary factors beyond pharmacology. This narrative review synthesizes clinical and real-world evidence to propose a phase-based integration framework that specifies complementary roles for psychiatry, nursing, and psychotherapy across pre-treatment assessment, induction, session delivery, post-session integration, and maintenance phases. The framework emphasizes safety, continuity of care, and patient-centred monitoring, with measurable implementation indicators. While evidence supports esketamine's efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms, anhedonia, and suicidality, prospective implementation studies are needed to evaluate clinical effectiveness, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of the proposed multidisciplinary approach.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Narrative review Randomized Peer reviewed
Population Patients with TRD receiving intranasal esketamine
Intervention Intranasal esketamine
Topics Depression
Keywords Anhedonia Multidisciplinary approach Depression economics Nasal administration
Citations 7
Key finding A structured phase-based multidisciplinary framework integrating psychiatry, nursing, and psychotherapy may support safer, more acceptable delivery of intranasal esketamine and potentially improve retention and patient experience, but prospective studies are needed.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Intranasal esketamine has emerged as an effective treatment for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), providing rapid symptom relief when conventional antidepressant strategies fail. While its pharmacological efficacy has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, less attention has been paid to the organizational, relational, and multidisciplinary aspects that influence its real-world implementation and clinical effectiveness. While practical recommendations for intranasal esketamine services exist, an implementation-ready framework integrating psychiatry, nursing, and psychotherapy across treatment phases is still lacking. This narrative review synthesizes the clinical and real-world evidence and proposes a phase-based integration framework with explicit role delineation and measurable implementation/fidelity indicators. Methods: We conducted a narrative review informed by a structured literature search in major databases from inception to the most recent update. Search terms combined 'esketamine'/'Spravato' with 'treatment-resistant depression', 'nursing', 'psychotherapy', 'multidisciplinary', and 'implementation'. Outcomes prioritized in the synthesis included depressive symptom severity/response, relapse prevention, safety/tolerability, anhedonia, suicidality monitoring, functional outcomes, and patient-reported experience/retention. Based on this evidence, an integrated, phase-based multidisciplinary framework for esketamine treatment was developed. Results: Available evidence supports the efficacy of intranasal esketamine in reducing depressive symptoms in TRD, with growing real-world data confirming its effectiveness and safety. Beyond global symptom improvement, studies highlight benefits on clinically relevant domains such as anhedonia and suicidality trajectories, as well as meaningful patient-reported outcomes. However, the complexity of esketamine delivery requires structured clinical pathways. The proposed model delineates complementary roles for medical supervision, nursing care, and psychotherapy across pre-treatment assessment, induction and session delivery, post-session integration, and maintenance phases, emphasizing safety, continuity of care, and patient-centred monitoring. Conclusions: Intranasal esketamine represents not only a pharmacological innovation but also a treatment that necessitates an integrated multidisciplinary approach. A structured phase-based multidisciplinary approach may support safer, more acceptable delivery of intranasal esketamine and potentially improve retention and patient experience; however, prospective implementation and comparative studies are needed to evaluate clinical effectiveness, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment