The emerging science of microdosing: A systematic review of research on low dose psychedelics (1955–2021) and recommendations for the field
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews May 21, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104706 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA systematic review of 44 studies on microdosing psychedelics, published between 1955 and 2021, finds that laboratory studies show changes in pain perception, time perception, conscious state, and neurophysiology, while self-report studies indicate changes in cognitive processing and mental health. The studies varied widely in risk of bias. The authors argue that claims attributing microdosing effects largely to expectancy are premature and possibly wrong. They also clarify definitional inconsistencies by suggesting dose ranges for different substances and provide design suggestions for more rigorous future research.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 44 |
| Population | Human participants in microdosing studies |
| Keywords | Expectancy theory Mood Cognition Mental health Perception |
| Citations | 110 |
| Key finding | Microdosing psychedelics is associated with changes in pain perception, time perception, conscious state, neurophysiology, cognitive processing, and mental health, and claims that effects are largely due to expectancy are premature and possibly wrong. |
Abstract
The use of low doses of psychedelic substances (microdosing) is attracting increasing interest. This systematic review summarises all empirical microdosing research to date, including a set of infrequently cited studies that took place prior to prohibition. Specifically, we reviewed 44 studies published between 1955 and 2021, and summarised reported effects across six categories: mood and mental health; wellbeing and attitude; cognition and creativity; personality; changes in conscious state; and neurobiology and physiology. Studies showed a wide range in risk of bias, depending on design, age, and other study characteristics. Laboratory studies found changes in pain perception, time perception, conscious state, and neurophysiology. Self-report studies found changes in cognitive processing and mental health. We review data related to expectation and placebo effects, but argue that claims that microdosing effects are largely due to expectancy are premature and possibly wrong. In addition, we attempt to clarify definitional inconsistencies in the microdosing literature by providing suggested dose ranges across different substances. Finally, we provide specific design suggestions to facilitate more rigorous future research.