Between enhancement and risk: A critical review of psychedelic microdosing
Iva Totomanova, Eline Haijen, Petra P M Hurks, Johannes G. Ramaekers, Kim P. C. Kuypers
Current Opinion in Psychology August 6, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102129 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractRegular use of low doses of LSD or psilocybin, known as microdosing, has been studied in 57 human studies. Reported benefits include improved mood, enhanced cognition, social functioning, and mental health, but findings are inconsistent and largely based on self-reports. Adverse effects such as anxiety, physical discomfort, and cognitive disruption are also common. Outcomes vary greatly by individual and are shaped by expectations, context, and baseline state. Experimental studies of single doses often yield null findings, while observational studies of repeated use report more benefits. The evidence remains inconclusive and warrants caution.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review Placebo-controlled Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Clinical and non-clinical populations |
| Keywords | Psychology |
| Citations | 5 |
| Key finding | Microdosing psychedelics shows potential benefits in mood, cognition, and mental health, but findings are inconsistent and often null in experimental trials, highlighting the need for rigorous placebo-controlled research. |
Abstract
Microdosing psychedelics, the regular use of low doses of LSD or psilocybin, have attracted growing public and scientific interest. This review synthesizes findings from 57 human studies on psychological and physiological outcomes in clinical and non-clinical populations. Reported benefits include improved mood, enhanced cognition, social functioning, and mental health, although findings are inconsistent and largely self-reported. Adverse effects such as anxiety, physical discomfort, and cognitive disruption are also frequently reported. Outcomes appear to be highly individual and shaped by user expectations, context, and baseline state. Notably, many experimental studies focus on the acute effects of single low doses, whereas observational studies reflect repeated use and generally report more benefits, while experimental trials tend to yield more null findings. Differences between observational and experimental findings highlight the need for rigorous, placebo-controlled research. While microdosing shows potential in some studies, current evidence remains inconclusive and warrants caution.